Flynn on June 30th, 2009

For Bunyan on the extent of the atonement, go here.
In this post I want to show how and why it is that Mr Chew’s arguments and conclusions regarding John Bunyan in his debate with Tony Byrne are irrelevant. For this post I want to cover Mr Chew’s initial discussion of Bunyan and then [...]

Continue reading about John Bunyan and the Five Step Shuffle

Flynn on June 29th, 2009

Well “E” for Effort to our Mr Chew in Singapore. Mr Chew has produced his reply. You can find it here as a downloadable PDF. His main post is here.
I printed out the little opus and scanned it eagerly. Unfortunately for us, the actual amount of reply probably could be fit on one [...]

Continue reading about P = I. I = Irrelevant. Therefore P = Irrelevant